The Incident Platform Engineers Actually Want to Use

Engineers are often frustrated with their incident management tools. Common complaints range from alert fatigue caused by endless notifications to clunky user interfaces and an overwhelming amount of manual work, or "toil." The ideal incident platform, from an engineer's perspective, is one that gets out of the way. It should prioritize automation, offer seamless integrations with existing tools, and facilitate clear collaboration. Adopting a modern approach to incident management is crucial for moving beyond simply reacting to outages and toward proactively learning from them to build more resilient systems.

What's Wrong with Traditional Incident Management Tools?

Many traditional incident management tools were designed for a different era of software development. Instead of reducing the workload on engineers, they often create more of it. While platforms like PagerDuty are powerful, they can also be complex and expensive, leading many teams to search for more streamlined and cost-effective PagerDuty alternatives [7].

The Burden of Alert Fatigue and Manual Toil

When alerting systems are poorly configured, they bombard engineers with notifications, leading to "alert fatigue." In this state, critical signals are easily missed amidst the noise, delaying response to real issues.

Compounding this problem is the manual toil associated with incident response. This includes repetitive tasks like:

• Manually creating a Slack or Microsoft Teams channel for each incident.
• Hunting down the right on-call engineers and inviting them to join.
• Updating status pages and notifying stakeholders.
• Piecing together a timeline of events for the post-mortem.

This manual work doesn't just slow down resolution times; it distracts engineers from the core task of diagnosing and fixing the actual problem.

Disjointed Workflows and Information Silos

A typical incident response can be chaotic. Conversations happen in Slack, tickets are tracked in Jira, relevant metrics are buried in Datadog, and retrospectives are documented in Confluence. With information scattered across multiple systems, it's nearly impossible to get a single, coherent view of an incident's lifecycle.

This fragmentation is a primary reason why many incident management solutions suffer from low user adoption and can take over a year to demonstrate a return on investment [3]. When tools add friction instead of removing it, engineers will naturally avoid them. Given that IT incidents can cost companies more than $400,000 per hour, this inefficiency is a costly problem [3].

The Engineer's Checklist for the Best Incident Management Platform

Engineers evaluating enterprise incident management solutions should look for specific capabilities that address the shortcomings of traditional tools. The following criteria can help you find a platform that your team will actually want to use.

Deep Integration and Powerful Automation

The best incident management platform must integrate deeply into the tools your team already uses every day, especially chat platforms like Slack. This "ChatOps" approach keeps responders in their primary workspace, reducing context switching. Furthermore, the platform should offer powerful, no-code automation to handle repetitive tasks. At Rootly, for example, customizable workflows can automate the entire incident lifecycle, from creating dedicated Slack channels and assigning roles to notifying stakeholders and scheduling follow-up tasks.

Intelligent On-Call and Escalation

Modern on-call management is about more than just paging someone. It’s about intelligently routing alerts to the right person with the right context. The best oncall software for teams includes features like:

• Flexible scheduling to accommodate complex rotations.
• Clear, multi-level escalation policies to ensure no alert is missed.
• Reliable multi-channel notifications (Slack, SMS, phone call).

Rootly ensures every critical signal reaches the right human, right away, with robust on-call scheduling and escalations that provide the context needed for a swift response.

A Focus on Learning, Not Just Closing Tickets

The ultimate goal of incident management isn't just to resolve incidents faster but to learn from them to prevent recurrence. A platform should facilitate continuous improvement with features like:

• Automatically generated timelines from Slack channel activity.
• Collaborative retrospectives (post-mortems) that are easy to create.
• Integrated action item tracking to ensure follow-ups are completed.

Rootly helps teams learn from every incident by automating data gathering for retrospectives and tracking action items to completion, fostering a culture of blameless learning and continuous improvement.

Incident Management Platform Comparison: How the Top Tools Stack Up

When conducting an incident management platform comparison, it's clear that different tools serve different needs. Some focus on ticketing for IT service management (ITSM), while others specialize in security incidents [2]. For modern engineering teams, the best choice is often a platform that unifies the entire response lifecycle.

Rootly vs. PagerDuty: A Modern Alternative

PagerDuty is well-regarded for its on-call scheduling and alerting capabilities, earning praise for its straightforward functionality [5]. However, many teams find its pricing and complexity to be a significant drawback, prompting a search for modern alternatives [8].

Rootly stands out as one of the best PagerDuty alternatives because it provides a true end-to-end solution. While PagerDuty excels at getting the alert to the right person, Rootly automates the entire incident lifecycle that follows—all directly within Slack. This eliminates the manual toil and information silos that plague teams using a collection of disparate tools. Platforms like Zenduty also position themselves as more user-friendly and cost-effective solutions for growing teams [6].

Evaluating Other Enterprise Incident Management Solutions

The market for incident management software is broad, with many tools offering a range of capabilities [4]. Some are built on large platforms like Salesforce and focus heavily on compliance and safety [1], while others are designed for specific use cases like enterprise service management. When evaluating top incident management tools for SaaS companies, it's critical to prioritize solutions that integrate seamlessly with a modern tech stack and are designed with the engineer's workflow in mind.

Rootly in Action: A Walkthrough of an Engineer-Friendly Incident

To understand the difference a modern platform makes, let's walk through a hypothetical incident managed with Rootly.

1. Automated Detection and Incident Declaration

An alert fires from a monitoring tool like Datadog. Based on predefined rules, Rootly automatically detects the alert and creates a new incident. It sets the severity, notifies the appropriate on-call team, and creates a dedicated Slack channel. Incidents can also be declared manually with a simple /incident command in Slack, which is perfect for issues first reported by customers or internal teams.

2. Coordinated Response and Triage in Slack

Within seconds, the on-call engineer is pulled into the new Slack channel. A summary of the incident, including the triggering alert and links to relevant dashboards, is already pinned. Without leaving Slack, responders can use Rootly commands to:

• Update the incident severity.
• Assign roles like "Incident Commander" or "Communications Lead."
• Create and assign action items.
• Post updates to a public status page.

This entire response and coordination phase is managed from a single location, keeping everyone aligned and focused.

3. Seamless Resolution and Automated Retrospectives

Once the issue is resolved, a responder runs the /incident resolve command. This triggers another set of automations. Rootly can automatically post a final update to stakeholders and, most importantly, create a retrospective document in Confluence or Google Docs. This document is pre-populated with the complete incident timeline, a list of all participants, key metrics like time-to-resolution, and the full chat log from the incident channel. This saves engineers hours of manual data gathering and ensures that valuable lessons are never lost.

Conclusion: Stop Fighting Your Tools and Start Building a Better Response Culture

Traditional incident management tools often create friction, forcing engineers to fight with their software instead of the fire. Modern platforms like Rootly empower engineers by automating toil, centralizing communication, and fostering a culture of collaboration and learning.

By integrating seamlessly with existing workflows and handling the repetitive tasks that bog down responders, Rootly proves itself to be the incident management platform engineers actually want to use. It is one of the top incident management tools for SaaS companies and a premier enterprise incident management solution because it helps teams build more reliable systems, not just close tickets faster.

Ready to see how an engineer-friendly platform can transform your incident response? Get started with Rootly and discover a better way to manage incidents.

‍