In today's digital-first landscape, system reliability isn't a luxury; it's a core business requirement. The speed and efficiency of your incident response process are directly tied to customer trust, revenue, and brand reputation. Every minute an application is down, the business suffers. This makes tools that reduce outage time essential. Two of the main contenders in the incident management space are PagerDuty, the established leader in on-call management and alerting, and Rootly, the automation-first platform designed for the entire incident lifecycle.
This article compares Rootly vs PagerDuty, focusing on how their distinct approaches to automation can close the Rootly vs PagerDuty reliability automation gap and significantly shrink your outage times.
The Core Conflict: Manual Toil vs. Automated Response
Traditional incident management is often a scramble of manual tasks. When an incident strikes, engineers must create communication channels, manually look up on-call schedules, notify stakeholders, and spin up conference bridges. This manual toil introduces delays at the most critical moments, increases the cognitive load on responders, and ultimately leads to a longer Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR).
Automation is the solution to these challenges. It allows teams to encode their best practices into repeatable, consistent processes. Modern incident management is built on workflows, which allow teams to run their process consistently and automatically every time, eliminating guesswork and human error.
PagerDuty: Strong Foundations in Alerting and On-Call
PagerDuty is a well-established and respected platform, primarily known for its powerful on-call scheduling and alerting capabilities. For years, it has been the go-to solution for ensuring the right person is notified when something breaks. Recognizing the need for broader capabilities, PagerDuty has expanded its features to include more incident management functionalities.
The platform provides Incident Workflow Actions, which allow teams to automate parts of their response, such as creating a Jira ticket or sending a Slack notification [8]. PagerDuty continues to evolve, adding new capabilities like AI-powered operations and flexible shift management to enhance its offering [6].
Rootly: The Automation-First Incident Management Platform
Rootly is a comprehensive incident management platform built from the ground up with automation at its core. It is designed to manage the entire incident lifecycle, from initial detection all the way through to the final retrospective.
The platform's power comes from its flexible and intuitive workflow engine, which can coordinate actions across your entire toolchain. Rootly integrates with over 70 tools—including PagerDuty, Jira, and Slack—allowing for highly customizable and powerful workflows that fit your team's specific needs [3].
Head-to-Head: Where Rootly's Automation Creates an Edge
While both platforms offer automation, their underlying philosophies and capabilities create a significant difference in practice.
Workflow Flexibility and Power
Rootly's Incident Workflows provide a vast library of triggers, conditions, and actions that offer granular control over the entire process. Workflows can be triggered by status changes, severity updates, role assignments, or even updates to custom fields. This allows for sophisticated, chained automations that adapt to the incident as it evolves.
In contrast, PagerDuty's approach centers on running a specific Automation Action from within an incident for users on specific pricing plans [7]. While useful for discrete tasks, it lacks the complex logic and native orchestration capabilities of Rootly, where entire processes can be automated with conditional branching and parallel tasks.
Centralized Control vs. Alert-Centric Automation
Rootly acts as a centralized command center for incidents. A single incident declared in Rootly can trigger a cascade of automations across Slack, Jira, Zoom, and PagerDuty simultaneously, bringing all necessary resources together in seconds. This approach is highly rated by users, with Rootly scoring 9.4 out of 10 on TrustRadius for its ability to automate incident response directly within Slack [2].
PagerDuty's automation, while improving, remains more focused on the alert and on-call response portion of the incident. It excels at getting an alert to the right person but offers less native orchestration for the collaborative resolution and post-incident activities that follow.
Integration and Extensibility
Both platforms integrate with other tools, but Rootly is designed to not only integrate with but also orchestrate them. A prime example is its deep integration with PagerDuty. Rootly can work seamlessly with your existing PagerDuty setup to automate paging the on-call, inviting them to the incident channel, and keeping incident status in sync.
For teams looking to consolidate, Rootly can also serve as a wholesale replacement for PagerDuty with its own robust On-Call scheduling and alerting solution, offering a single platform for the entire incident lifecycle.
How Superior Automation Shrinks Outage Time
The practical benefit of a superior automation engine is a dramatic reduction in outage time. Here’s how:
Automating Incident Kick-off and Triage
When an incident is declared, every second counts. Rootly's workflows can instantly perform critical setup tasks that used to take minutes of manual effort. This includes:
- Creating a dedicated Slack channel.
- Inviting the correct on-call engineers from a PagerDuty rotation.
- Assigning incident roles like Commander and Comms Lead.
- Starting a Zoom call and posting the link.
- Creating a Jira ticket and linking it to the incident.
By using pre-built PagerDuty workflow actions, you can automatically assign roles from an on-call rotation and invite the right people to the channel, eliminating the crucial minutes of manual setup at the start of an incident.
Keeping Responders and Stakeholders in Sync
Automated workflows handle repetitive communication tasks, freeing the incident commander to focus on resolution. Rootly can be configured to post scheduled reminders for status updates, automatically notify stakeholder channels of severity changes, and update external status pages. This ensures everyone stays informed without distracting the core response team.
Learning and Improving from Every Incident
Automation extends far beyond resolution. Once an incident is resolved, Rootly can automatically:
- Generate a retrospective document with a complete, timestamped timeline of events.
- Create and assign follow-up action items in Jira.
- Archive the incident channel and post a summary.
This guarantees that valuable lessons are captured and acted upon, systematically hardening your systems and improving long-term reliability.
Conclusion: Closing the Automation Gap for Faster Resolution
While PagerDuty provides an excellent and indispensable service for on-call management and alerting, Rootly offers a more comprehensive and powerful automation platform for end-to-end incident management. The choice between them is a strategic one for teams looking to truly enhance their incident response capabilities for the future [1].
The Rootly vs PagerDuty reliability automation gap is filled by Rootly's unique ability to serve as an intelligent orchestration layer for your entire incident response process. By automating toil from declaration to retrospective, Rootly significantly shrinks outage times and empowers your teams to build more reliable services.
See for yourself how Rootly can integrate with your existing tools—including its ability to automatically respond to PagerDuty events—or centralize your entire incident management process. Request a demo to get started.

.avif)





















