Compare On-Call Platforms: Rootly, Betterstack, FireHydrant

In today's digital-first world, your system's reliability is your reputation. The slightest hiccup can erode user trust, and significant downtime can be catastrophic, with some outages costing companies millions. [2] This reality has made efficient on-call and incident management not just a technical necessity but a powerful competitive advantage. As engineering teams evolve, many are finding that legacy tools no longer cut it, leading them to search for modern PagerDuty alternatives or Opsgenie alternatives that offer more than just alerts.

This guide compares three prominent on-call platforms: Rootly, Betterstack, and FireHydrant. Our goal is to help you compare oncall platforms and discover the best oncall software for teams by breaking down their philosophies, features, and ideal use cases.

In-Depth Comparison: Rootly vs. Betterstack vs. FireHydrant

This section will provide a detailed look at each platform, exploring their core approaches to incident management, standout features, and the types of teams they serve best.

Rootly: The AI-Powered Incident Management Hub

Rootly is a comprehensive incident management platform meticulously engineered to automate the entire incident lifecycle—from the initial alert through detection, response, and crucial post-incident learning. It's built to serve as a central command center, turning chaos into control.

Key features include:

• Deep Slack Integration: Rootly operates within Slack, allowing teams to manage incidents without context switching.
• Powerful Workflow Automation: It automates repetitive tasks, from creating channels and inviting responders to updating stakeholders, freeing engineers to focus on resolution.
• A Suite of AI-Powered Features: Rootly leverages artificial intelligence for proactive and efficient incident management.

The platform stands out by answering the question of How Rootly improves outage predictability with AI insights. Instead of merely reacting to failures, Rootly's AI analyzes system signals to identify potential problems before they escalate into service-disrupting outages. You can learn more about how Rootly AI uses anomaly detection to forecast downtime and prevent regressions. This proactive stance is why Rootly emerged as a significant new player in the incident management space. [4] Furthermore, Rootly helps cultivate a culture of continuous improvement with its blameless post-incident process, which provides real insights through automated timeline reconstruction and data-driven retrospectives.

Betterstack: Unifying Observability and On-Call

Betterstack positions itself as a unified platform, bundling monitoring, logging, on-call scheduling, and status pages into a single product. It aims to simplify the observability stack for teams that want an all-in-one solution.

Its main features include:

• Integrated Monitoring: It combines uptime monitoring and log management in one interface.
• Status Pages: The platform is known for its aesthetically pleasing and easy-to-configure status pages.
• Simple On-Call: It offers straightforward on-call scheduling and alerting workflows.

However, some teams find that as they scale, the initial simplicity presents challenges. Users have reported unpredictable pricing models that can escalate quickly and a desire for more comprehensive visibility than what a single dashboard provides. [1]

FireHydrant: Flexibility and Runbook Automation

FireHydrant's primary focus is on codifying and automating incident response processes through its flexible "runbooks." It's designed for teams that want to standardize their response playbooks as code.

Key features include:

• Automated Runbooks: You can create detailed, automated workflows tailored to different incident severities and types.
• Strong Integrations: It integrates well with CI/CD pipelines and other developer tools, embedding incident management into the development lifecycle.
• Process Analytics: FireHydrant provides analytics focused on improving incident response processes and tracking key metrics.

FireHydrant excels at process automation, earning its place among the top incident management tools for organizations that prioritize highly structured, repeatable workflows. [2]

Feature Breakdown: A Head-to-Head Look

This table provides a clear, at-a-glance summary of how the three platforms stack up against each other across key features.

Feature

Rootly

Betterstack

FireHydrant

AI & Predictive Insights

Leader. Advanced AI suite to summarize incidents, suggest solutions, and even predict and prevent reliability regressions. [6]

Basic alerts and triggers.

Focused on process automation, not predictive AI.

On-Call Scheduling

Flexible schedules, routing rules, and escalations.

Simplified scheduling and alerts.

Robust scheduling with a focus on runbook triggers.

Incident Automation

Powerful no-code workflow engine to automate the entire lifecycle, from declaring incidents to publishing retrospectives. [7]

Limited to basic alerting workflows.

Leader. Granular, code-based runbook automation.

Integrations

Extensive library of deep, bi-directional integrations with tools like Slack, Jira, Datadog, and more.

Integrates with key monitoring tools.

Strong integrations with development and infra tools.

Post-Incident Analysis

Automated timeline reconstruction and data-rich retrospectives that power rapid response and learning.

Basic incident logs for review.

Analytics centered on runbook execution and process metrics.

Status Pages

Fully customizable and automated status pages.

Aesthetically pleasing and simple to set up.

Customizable status pages tied to incident state.

Pricing Model

Per-user pricing with tiers based on features and support. [3]

Usage-based, which can be unpredictable. [1]

Per-user pricing, with add-ons for specific features.

Who is Each Platform Best For?

The right choice depends on your team's size, operational maturity, and specific goals. Here are some clear recommendations to help you decide.

Choose Rootly if...

• You are one of the top incident management tools for saas companies or a scaling enterprise that needs a single, powerful platform to manage the entire incident lifecycle.
• Your primary goals are to leverage AI for proactive reliability, automate manual toil, and foster a data-driven culture of continuous improvement.
• You require deep Slack integration for a native command center experience and robust analytics to track and improve metrics like Mean Time to Resolution (MTTR).

Choose Betterstack if...

• You're a startup or a smaller team looking for a simple, all-in-one solution that combines basic monitoring with on-call alerting.
• A visually appealing user interface and easy-to-configure status pages are high on your list of priorities.

Choose FireHydrant if...

• Your main objective is to codify complex and highly specific incident response processes into automated runbooks.
• You have a mature operations team that desires granular, code-level control over defining and executing incident response workflows.

Conclusion: Making the Right Choice for Your Team

Choosing an on-call platform is a critical decision that directly impacts your system's reliability and your engineers' well-being. The market is clearly moving away from simple alerting and toward intelligent automation that reduces downtime and prevents burnout. [5]

The best choice hinges on your organization's specific needs:

• Rootly: For comprehensive, AI-driven incident management. [8]
• Betterstack: For unified, simple observability and on-call.
• FireHydrant: For flexible, process-centric automation.

For teams looking to build a truly resilient system, a platform that manages the entire incident lifecycle is essential. Rootly is designed from the ground up to automate response, centralize communication, and generate actionable insights for continuous learning.

Ready to see how Rootly can transform your incident management? Explore our platform's capabilities and get an overview of how Rootly works.

‍